Beautiful Souls:
Everyone can get a bonus point on the last quiz this week. Please write a review of the first three assignments in 250-500 words. This will also count as a regular blog post and will be available for commenting. Do not comment on this post, rather, make one of your own.
Good luck, and I hope your assignments this weekend go well. Don't forget to finish the TED talk by Monday.
Best,
Mr. S.
Saturday, January 31, 2015
Friday, January 30, 2015
Video for Monday
http://www.ted.com/talks/rory_sutherland_life_lessons_from_an_ad_man?language=en#t-545958
Sunday, January 25, 2015
The Angry in Gaming
This is a link to an example of the angry environment in
video games community. This is a disturbing trend that I began to notice to
occur in the past few years. Our class talks about conveying messages to
people. The article is about a Bioware writer, Jennifer Hepler, who help writer
the story of Dragon Age 2. She received death threats from internet forums and
twitter to her and her family life after leaving Bioware in 2013 to become a
freelancer. This situation and several others are great examples of
cyberbullying and creating a toxic environment for creators in the video games
company. The gamer audience is becoming a big nest of angry that misusing its
power and violently attack people. The gamer audience punishes creators for
making minor to insignificants changes in the game. This conveys a strong
message to any writer or creator who is interested in joining the business to
be prepared to receive harassments and death threats from self-entitlement
people if they step out of line.
Criticism is an important thing. It is needed in every type
of medium to point out problems and to help the creator to improve their future
work. The angry is the gamer audience is a good and powerful tool if used
properly. The many companies that support and produce game for the video game
indusial have a history of trying to take vantage the average gamer by release
incomplete game, Digital Right Management, and by using false advertising. I
believe there the angry in the gamer audience is reasonable and should be
calling out real problem, but they should be threaten people’s life
Friday, January 23, 2015
Draco and Solon
Draco was a lawgiver in Ancient Athens who was ultimately
known for the extremely harsh nature he created and condoned for the punishment
for crimes. No matter theft or murder, nearly
any law broken resulted in death. Mere
debt was punishable with enslavement-- I imagine we’d all be in pretty deep
trouble in Athens. This legal code was referred to as Draconian and it is still
used today to describe the most oppressive and harsh of law systems. This code is said to be one of the most
comprehensive original sets of written laws, in spite of its cruel nature.
Luckily for the Athenians, when Solon became a part of office
he repealed Draco’s sadistic laws and created his own that more appropriately
matched each crime. This statute of law
was long standing, lasting well into the 5th century and serving as
a foundation for all the laws that followed.
In the article I read, it claimed that Draco’s laws were so
severe that some claimed it was written in blood. I find this extremely intriguing. While it’s highly unlikely the man literally
wrote the code of laws in some poor citizens blood (although I’m not sure I’d
put it past him), I think that this is more a representation of what these laws
meant for and did to the people of Athens.
They were written in the blood of the people and were created to draw
more. Generally writing in blood is
associated with dark, demonic behavior and I’m sure this was not the prettiest
of times in Athens.
In relation to class right now, I think that this could abstractly
relate to reacting appropriately to your audience. Draco went completely overboard, giving every
crime no matter the severity an equal punishment, when it would’ve been far
more intuitive to understand and match each crime with a punishment that was equal. Understanding is vitally important in all
forms of writing.
Thursday, January 22, 2015
Key and Peele- Text Message Confusion
Key and Peele video
When we were talking in class about conveying a message without offending anyone, this video came to mind. In any type of writing,in this case texting it is easy for someone to take offense to what you are saying, because they cannot hear how you are saying your message. Tone can often be misinterpreted by the reader. In this case, Jordan Peele wants to convey a friendly tone, while Key interprets his tone as annoyed and uncaring. I know that scenarios similar to this have happens to me because I misinterpreted tone in text messages, and comment replies on Facebook. This video shows that one sentence can be interpreted a bunch of different ways. It can be interpreted as a kind message, or a threat. For example, Key texts Jordan" You wanna go right now?" . Key wants to come off as threatening, and aggressive, because he wants to fight Jordan. Jordan interprets this an entirely different way. Jordan thinks that Key just wants to hang out at the bar right now so he responds " Okay let's go.". This comes off as aggressive to Key which leads him to think he's going to fight Jordan at the bar.
This video illustrates why conveying tone is important. It important to make sure your wording isn't in anyway threatening or offensive to your audience, or else you could end up with them blowing up on you like Key did on Jordan.
Hope you enjoyed the video. I apologize if the harsh language offends anyone .I couldn't find a censored version
When we were talking in class about conveying a message without offending anyone, this video came to mind. In any type of writing,in this case texting it is easy for someone to take offense to what you are saying, because they cannot hear how you are saying your message. Tone can often be misinterpreted by the reader. In this case, Jordan Peele wants to convey a friendly tone, while Key interprets his tone as annoyed and uncaring. I know that scenarios similar to this have happens to me because I misinterpreted tone in text messages, and comment replies on Facebook. This video shows that one sentence can be interpreted a bunch of different ways. It can be interpreted as a kind message, or a threat. For example, Key texts Jordan" You wanna go right now?" . Key wants to come off as threatening, and aggressive, because he wants to fight Jordan. Jordan interprets this an entirely different way. Jordan thinks that Key just wants to hang out at the bar right now so he responds " Okay let's go.". This comes off as aggressive to Key which leads him to think he's going to fight Jordan at the bar.
This video illustrates why conveying tone is important. It important to make sure your wording isn't in anyway threatening or offensive to your audience, or else you could end up with them blowing up on you like Key did on Jordan.
Hope you enjoyed the video. I apologize if the harsh language offends anyone .I couldn't find a censored version
Tuesday, January 20, 2015
Advocating for Change
Wednesday, January 14, 2015
McDonald's and Pathos
http://www.today.com/money/new-mcdonalds-signs-ad-draws-heated-reactions-1D80418484
This is the link to that strange and unsettling McDonald's ad. A lot of people were really upset by this. It's a perfect example of pathos gone wrong. Pathos as you may recall, is a way of persuasion by appealing to people's emotions. In the ad, they try to feign a sense of community by using certain signs to appeal the American public. These signs had things on them such as “We believe in you Crystal,” “We remember 9/11,” and even “Boston Strong,” referring to the Boston marathon bombing. Some shots show the restaurant and sign severely damaged or even underwater from floods. I can see what they were trying to do but they just failed horribly. I wonder which genius in the marketing department at McDonald’s came up with this and patted himself on the back for it. When using pathos it is incredibly important to know your audience, really when using any kind of technique to persuade it’s important to know your audience. McDonald’s seriously fell flat when it came to gauging how the American people would feel about seeing such things. This ad also showed how design is so crucial to persuading people and getting them to feel a certain way. This was very poorly designed and executed, therefore, people were not moved by it in the way that McDonald’s meant. They were moved, but to outrage and anger. Hopefully in the future they do a little bit more research about their audience so that they can avoid another blunder like this.
Monday, January 12, 2015
Silva Rhetoricae Review
I just completed a quick once-over of the Silva Rhetoricae
webpage and thought it would make a nice start to talk a bit about it as my
first post. I was not entirely certain what to expect from this class (despite
the fairly descriptive name) and was relieved to have the opportunity to get a
quick preview of the tools and skills we will likely be using and
learning.
It was particularly comforting to see some familiar faces in
the form of the persuasive appeals, and they brought back a few
speech-composing memories. While
speech-giving itself has never been a strength I possess, I look forward to learning
to better my abilities through this course.
Judging by the tools presented on this page, I assume I can count on it.
While I did recognize a few terms, there were far more that
I had never before heard of or used. Upon
further reading, though, I determined many of the words were intimidating
titles for far simpler ideas. The canons
of rhetoric, as an example, were understandable once I looked into them and discovered
that they generally were just names for ideas and tools I have used in the past
or at least have heard of.
I look forward to using this page as a supplement to assist
my pursuit of knowledge throughout the semester. Writing of all varieties has always been one
of my passions and I am excited for the chance to continue to enhance and feed
my abilities.
BYU Rhetoric. So fun.
Hello, class! This is a link to Brigham Young University's site on rhetoric. Since this is a rhetoric class, and you have to comment on some post this week, I thought I'd give you all a website to browse. You may comment on this post about anything on the posted site. Or, you can all get rockin' and rollin' and write your own posts.
Welcome to the internet; welcome to this class!
S.S.
Welcome to the internet; welcome to this class!
S.S.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)