This class was a lot different than I was expecting. If I taught it, I would do some things
different, but all in all, I enjoyed the class.
I really liked how the class was structured overall. We started out very small, just figuring out
some problems in our community, and we ended up writing a research paper aimed
at proposing a solution to one of those problems that we originally came up
with. I really liked how the
assignments, for the most part, were aimed at getting us to explore different
rhetorical ideas, and building on those ideas up to the final paper. The most helpful assignments were the
presentation and Assignment 2.1, where we had to argue both sides of our
argument. The presentation helped with
the organization of my arguments. I was
able to group arguments and find sources that pertained to each group. Assignment 2.1 was helpful because it is easy
to forget that there are two sides to an argument, and that if you don’t address
the other viewpoints, you won’t be very convincing in your argument. It is easy to list all of the reasons why you
think you are right. It is much harder
to formulate arguments for why someone else is wrong. The biggest thing that I would change about
the class is the structure of the blog.
I feel like part of the reason that there are so many people posting on
the blog so late is that there was a lot of ambiguity as to what we should
write about. We didn’t know what to
write about, so we just didn’t write. If
the blog was given more direction, or specific prompts for some of the posts, I
think that we would be much more compelled to do the posts. In addition, I think that this would allow
for much more discussion in the comments. All in all, I’m glad that I took this
class, and I think I am a better writer for it.
No comments:
Post a Comment